Xerath’s II Reviewed

As an angry commentor once told me, when I don’t like an album for very specific reasons I should instead just say that I don’t like the sound of the band despite that having nothing to do with it. For unrelated reasons, I’m tempted to not post negative reviews anymore. The purpose of this blog is mostly to point out why non-metal music listeners that appreciate well composed music might have something to listen to. Posting about albums I don’t particularly like doesn’t really accomplish this goal.

For awhile I’ve been wanting to break into the so-called symphonic death metal scene. The idea of it really appeals to me. The rough idea is to use an orchestra, but then mix it with metal. I grew up on orchestral music. This seemed like a natural next step from my metal obsession. In order to pick out an album to get I went to youtube and typed in some generic search and started clicking through lots and lots of songs.

I wasn’t really into anything I was hearing, but the one that stood out was the first song on the album II by Xerath which came out May 3, 2011. The song had this beautiful string section playing these long flowing lines over an intense metal band. This style was essentially invented by Shostakovich and now here is a metal band using it. It is very effective and cool.

Once the novelty of the style wore off I was left wanting more. First off, large swaths of this album subject the “symphonic” aspect to the background and you are left just listening to standard sounding metal. This was kind of disappointing. The orchestra might be most pronounced on the song that drew me in.

Also, somehow the music didn’t have enough meat to it. There are certainly some complicated, interesting things going on, but for a large part (maybe the majority) of the album it is just your standard fare. It might be what you’d call “radio metal.” I tune out for it because there isn’t enough interesting stuff going on to keep my full attention. It is the type of stuff that kept me away from metal for all those years.

When it’s good, it is really great, but there is too much down time for me to be excited about the album as a whole. If you know of a really awesome symphonic metal band let me know. I’m still holding out hope for greatness. I’ll give this a 5.5/10, but of course that’s completely random.

Here’s a sample (not off this album, but really emphasizes the style that drew me in):

5 thoughts on “Xerath’s II Reviewed

  1. ciciocle says:

    hello mister, I like your blog, even if i don’t understand all your technical comments. I listen to a lot of metal music, various genres and sub-genres. symphonic metal is not one of them, but there is an album I really like, Sigh’s Hangman’s Hymn. it’s not death metal, is black metal, but not the stuff 99% of black metal bands put out. check out this song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bSzodv_C2g
    I hope you’ll like it

  2. hilbertthm90 says:

    Thanks! I’ll check it out.

  3. lol says:

    your full of shit mate

  4. Ryan says:

    Yeah.. Xerath is a bit weird. They really don’t sound like much else but it’s not always interesting. Its been a while since I’ve listened but III rectifies the “generic” metal bits present in I & II.. though to my ears a good portion of it is influenced by Vulgar Display of Power & Far Beyond Driven (make of that what you will). Actually, I’d be very interested to see your take on it. It’s a tough album to rate for sure.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s